※Click here to see this article written in Japanese.
The progression of time deceptively appears to possess completeness in our recognition, yet this is merely an illusion of cyclic chains between starting and ending points. Time exists as an inherent value and fundamentally unequal entity. Until we liberate ourselves from the illusion of duality between time and temporal moments, we cannot essentially comprehend our behavioral principles.
Remarkably, the greatest blind spot in human thought systems lies in excessive trust in self-completeness. While we tend to believe our thoughts and actions occur within some perfect logical framework, this precisely constitutes the most dangerous self-deception.
Among words existing in the world, a certain number operate in concealment, having proliferated with incorrect interpretations embedded within them. The word "action" used at this moment exemplifies this—its original inherent image would align with "materialization of thought" or "trial of thought." Words commonly used in daily life reflect and scatter in multiple directions, dispersing from their original directional connections, thus comfortably employed across various contexts.
While "formalization" often appears in negative contexts, in truth, natural formalization through self-purifying optimization evidences a system's essential evolution. Like the natural metabolism of cells in biological systems, this represents an unavoidable and necessary process. However, this formalization must remain under conscious control, fundamentally differing from mere temporal degradation. 」
Temporal degradation results from escapist corrosive transition; what we advocate here is purifying optimization.
The greatest fallacy in our recognition system lies in perceiving limitations as upper bounds. Limitations properly function as barriers in state transitions—not walls to overcome, but rather points of transformation toward new states.
Though this perspective shift harbors the potential to fundamentally alter our behavioral patterns, it emerges through habitual training results and, being discoverable in nature, its acquisition involves some element of fortune. Consequently, very few can achieve multiple transformative discoveries per unit time.
Thus far, we can say that attaining clarity represents more than mere thought organization. It constitutes a process of purifying potential formalization elements, and this process itself induces thought deepening. However, this clarity never emerges through passive temporal progression. It manifests only through active thought accumulation. Passive cyclic time essentially represents regression, and true evolution remains impossible without its elimination.
When maintaining and daily improving one's projects, this leads to exploratory behavior seeking elements to arrange "how to structure routines, how to strictly observe routines." Attributing personal dysfunction to external factors proves easy. However, this typically results from underestimating transitivity and maintaining an indolent attitude.
While we tend to perceive causality linearly, actual causation possesses complex network structures, and lacking this recognition becomes the essential cause of dysfunction.
Most intriguing is how a single ingenuity can effect dramatic change. This requires understanding not as hyperbole but rather like the butterfly effect in complex systems. However, this "single ingenuity" signifies not superficial techniques or methodologies, but fundamental thought system transformation. From this perspective, what we naturally consider complete must verify absence of contradiction, as its beginning derives from terminal transition.
Lowering task thresholds indicates more than mere simplification. It represents reconstruction based on understanding essential structure, naturally shedding unnecessary elements in the process. This shedding process embodies true optimization and characterizes beautiful formalization.
Our recognition system's greatest challenge lies in attachment to static completeness. True completeness includes recognizing countless state transition possibilities between start and end points. This requires understanding not as a fixed destination but as dynamic equilibrium always containing new change potential.
This dynamic equilibrium recognition fundamentally alters our behavioral patterns, transforming fixed goal-achievement thinking to continuous evolution process thinking. This transformation paves the true path to self-realization.
As an example of perspective transformation, from some future viewpoint, this process concept itself might cast humans as repaintable objects. Rather than viewing process through its popularized meaning of "progression," we realize that goals or objectives represent results necessarily emerging under the dominion of "pursuit of some new phenomenon" born from their own utility and existence post-achievement. Pursuing them through other methods equates to praying for contingency. Thus, the pure approach of "absolutely achieving, wanting to achieve that goal" inevitably evaluates as "other methods"—in other words, error. When the directional nature of process transforms from retrospective progression to necessity as a result of domination, the dynamic equilibrium recognition mentioned here might be understood not as continuous evolution but as restraints dominating desired results.
Finally, one must recognize that adjusting pseudo-random numbers in choosing which transformations to live by constitutes "discovery of transformation." Ultimately, it depends on internalizing and implementing this. Perhaps this operation returns from the world through formalized thought habit responses as the ultimate path of stereogramming will—knowing reason through one eye while bio-reflecting contradictory collapse through the other.